This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
9845b-1838a01653 [2018/09/10 16:13] cic [Initial Inspection] |
9845b-1838a01653 [2018/09/10 16:17] cic [Initial Inspection] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
* +17: 17.97V, +13: 13.04V, -17: -18.06V | * +17: 17.97V, +13: 13.04V, -17: -18.06V | ||
* +18: 19.02V, <color red>+12: 2.18V</color>, +7: 6.98V, +5: 5.14V, -12: -12.14V, -18: -19.06V | * +18: 19.02V, <color red>+12: 2.18V</color>, +7: 6.98V, +5: 5.14V, -12: -12.14V, -18: -19.06V | ||
- | \\ | + | Other than the +12 value, everything is within specification (+/-17V and 18V call for a +/-1V variation, but I'm not worried about a few hundredths of a volt). This is pretty amazing performance from a 40ish year-old power supply.\\ |
- | Other than the +12 value, everything is within spec (+/-17V and 18V call for a +/-1V variation, but I'm not worried about a few hundredths of a volt). This is pretty amazing performance from a 40ish year-old power supply.\\ | + | |
\\ | \\ | ||
Now on to the +12V problem ... | Now on to the +12V problem ... |